CFPB Rulemaking Proposes to Ban Medical Debt from Credit Reports

Medical debt has long been a significant burden for millions of citizens in America. The complexities surrounding how it is reported on credit scores and its subsequent financial repercussions have pushed regulatory bodies to reevaluate its place in credit systems. 

In its latest move, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has proposed groundbreaking rules to ban medical debt from credit reports altogether as of June 11, 2024. 

Let’s delve deeper into this ruling and learn its implications and the challenges it seeks to address.

Credit Reporting Agencies and Medical Debt

One of the major issues in America regarding medical debt is that the three major credit reporting agencies—Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion—play a pivotal role in determining creditworthiness. These agencies are privately owned, and they maintain credit reports, which often include medical debts reported by healthcare providers and collection agencies. 

In April 2023, these agencies announced a significant policy change: they would stop including medical debts under $500 in credit reports. This step was a response to mounting pressure from consumer advocates and policymakers. The statute of limitations on medical debt in America is generally around 7 years (varies from state to state), but it highlights the undue harm caused by relatively small debts on individuals’ financial profiles. 

While the move was a step forward, it fell short of addressing the broader issue. Around 15 million Americans still face significant medical debt reflected on their credit reports, often for amounts exceeding $500. 

This debt disproportionately impacts marginalized communities, including low-income households and individuals from minority groups. The impact of medical debt on credit reports not only hinders financial stability but also acts as a barrier to housing, employment, and even education opportunities.

Next, let’s take a look at the rule proposed by CFPB.

The Proposed Rule by CFPB

In June 2024, the CFPB proposed a transformative rule that seeks to ban the reporting of medical debt entirely on credit reports. This proposal goes beyond the incremental changes introduced by credit reporting agencies, aiming to address systemic issues in the debt collection and reporting ecosystem.

One of the primary motivations behind the proposed rule is to curb what the CFPB terms “coercive collection practices.” Debt collectors often leverage the threat of negative credit reporting to pressure individuals into repaying medical bills. By removing medical debt from credit reports, the CFPB aims to eliminate this form of coercion, ensuring that medical debt collection practices are more transparent and equitable.

CFPB Director Rohit Chopra has argued that medical debt arises primarily from emergencies, making it fundamentally different from other forms of debt. Unlike consumer debt, which is often tied to discretionary spending, medical debt is unavoidable and stems from life-threatening situations or unexpected health crises.

Proposed Changes and Justifications

The CFPB’s proposed rule introduces several key changes that, if enacted, could reshape the landscape of the world of credit reporting:

1. Elimination of Exceptions: The current regulations allow medical debt to be considered in credit decisions under specific circumstances. The proposed rule seeks to eliminate these exceptions, ensuring a consistent approach across all types of medical debt.
   
   
2. Prohibition on Collateralization: The proposal also includes a ban on using medical devices, such as wheelchairs or oxygen tanks, as collateral for unpaid medical bills. This measure aims to protect consumers from losing essential medical equipment due to financial hardship.

The rationale behind these changes is simple: firstly, it is considered to be more humane, and secondly, medical debt is not an accurate indicator of creditworthiness. Including it in credit reports penalizes individuals for healthcare costs that are often beyond their control, perpetuating cycles of financial instability.

Moving on to the impact of medical debt and federal policies.

The Impact of Medical Debt

Medical debt is one of the leading causes of financial instability in the United States. It is not only a primary driver of bankruptcy filings but also significantly impacts access to basic necessities such as housing, credit, and employment.

1. Impact on Loans and Credit Access: A single medical debt entry on a credit report can lower credit scores, reducing an individual’s ability to secure loans at favorable rates. For low-income families, this can mean perpetuating financial struggles, as they may turn to predatory lenders to meet their needs.
   
   
2. Barriers to Housing and Employment: Many landlords and employers conduct credit checks as part of their screening processes. A poor credit score, often caused by unpaid medical debt, can disqualify otherwise eligible candidates from securing housing or employment opportunities.
   
   
3. Disproportionate Effect on Vulnerable Populations: The burden of medical debt is not evenly distributed. Minority groups, women, and individuals in rural areas are disproportionately affected due to disparities in access to affordable healthcare and systemic inequalities in income and wealth distribution.

Federal Policies on Medical Debt

Federal regulations have attempted to address some aspects of medical debt reporting, but there are several gaps that remain:

1. Tax Code Provisions: The tax code classifies the reporting of medical debt as an “extraordinary collections action.” Healthcare providers must exhaust other options, such as offering payment plans, before reporting debts. However, enforcement of these provisions varies significantly, leaving many consumers vulnerable to aggressive collection practices.
   
   
2. Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA): This legislation governs what can and cannot be included in credit reports. While it offers certain exemptions for medical debt, these exemptions are limited and inconsistently applied. The CFPB’s proposal aims to bridge these gaps by creating uniform standards that prioritize consumer protection.

Now that we have learned about the federal policies, let's take a look at the challenges faced by the proposed rule change

Challenges and Limitations

While the CFPB’s proposed rule marks a significant step forward, it is not without its challenges. There are still limitations and drawbacks that are stark: 

1. Access to Data by Employers and Landlords: Even if medical debt is excluded from credit reports, employers and landlords can still access this information through other channels, such as public records or alternative credit reporting systems. Technically, these parties can still enforce coercive collection practices, leaving the consumer vulnerable.
   
   
2. Credit Card-Based Medical Expenses: The proposed rule does not address medical expenses charged to credit cards. These debts remain subject to traditional reporting practices, potentially leaving consumers exposed to financial risks.
   
   
3. Administrative and Legal Hurdles: Implementing this rule will require significant coordination between the CFPB, credit reporting agencies, and healthcare providers. The sheer amount of red tape around this change would take a while to implement and enforce the rule. Additionally, ongoing legal challenges to the CFPB’s leadership and funding structure could delay or derail the rule’s finalization.

In the legal context, how does the proposed rule unfold? Let’s take a look. 

Legal Context and Future Prospects

The CFPB’s proposed rule is unfolding against a backdrop of legal and political uncertainty. The agency has faced numerous legal challenges, including questions about its authority and funding mechanisms. If these challenges succeed, they could undermine the CFPB’s ability to enforce its proposed rule.

The outcome of the 2024 presidential elections could also play a critical role. A change in administration could shift the CFPB’s priorities, potentially stalling or reversing the proposed changes.

At the state level, several legislatures are exploring their policies on medical debt reporting. Depending on how state and federal regulations align, These efforts could complement or complicate the CFPB’s initiatives.

Conclusion

The CFPB’s proposal to ban medical debt from credit reports represents a bold and necessary step toward creating a fairer financial system. By addressing the unique challenges posed by medical debt, the rule aims to reduce financial hardships and promote equity in credit reporting.

For consumers, the potential benefits are immense: improved access to credit, housing, and employment opportunities and relief from the psychological burden of medical debt. However, the rule’s limitations and the challenges it faces underscore the need for continued advocacy and innovation in this space.

Ready to simplify financial management for your organization? Discover how Tratta’s Consumer Self-Service Platform can empower your business to streamline debt collection and improve consumer engagement. Learn more today!